Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Latimer v. NC Parole Commission, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling affirming the district court's denial of relief to Rickie Latimer in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the North Carolina Parole Commission and its commissioners. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision based on the same reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-09-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6543

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling affirming the district court's denial of relief to Rickie Latimer in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the North Carolina Parole Commission and its commissioners. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision based on the same reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Latimer v. NC Parole Commission, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling affirming the district court's denial of relief to Rickie Latimer in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the North Carolina Parole Commission and its commissioners. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision based on the same reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6543

    RICKIE LATIMER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA PAROLE COMMISSION, as to the
    Commissioners, North Carolina Parole Commission, in their individual capacities only;
    JUANITA H. BAKER; ELBERT T. BUCK, JR.; CHARLES
    LEE MANN, SR.; WILLIAM A. LOWRY; PEGGY STAMEY;
    CHARLES CROMER; LOUIS R. COLOMBO; SAMUEL WILSON; BRIGGS BRUCE; KATRENA B. HORTON; ARLENE
    PULLEY; JOSEPH E. SLATE, JR.; WANDA J. GARRETT; JEFFREY T. LEDBETTER; LEON STANBACK,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    NORTH CAROLINA PAROLE COMMISSION, Commissioners/
    Case Analyst,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-98-854-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    September 8, 2000

    Decided:

    September 15, 2000

    Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rickie Latimer, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF


    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,
    for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Rickie Latimer appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    See Latimer v. North Carolina Parole Commn,

    No. CA-98-854-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2000).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like