Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Roderick Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. As such, the Court of Appeals denied Harris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6640

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Roderick Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. As such, the Court of Appeals denied Harris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Roderick Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. As such, the Court of Appeals denied Harris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6640

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RODERICK EUGENE HARRIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-98-16, CA-00-440-1)

    Submitted:

    August 9, 2001

    Decided:

    August 15, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Roderick Eugene Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Timika Shafeek, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Roderick Eugene Harris seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court. See United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-98-16; CA-00440-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 28, 2000; entered Mar. 29, 2001).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like