Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1986 in which Arthur Bradley appealed a district court's ruling in favor of the Secretary of the Navy on a Title VII claim of employment discrimination. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on recent authoritative decisions. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 9, 1985 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1986 in which Arthur Bradley appealed a district court's ruling in favor of the Secretary of the Navy on a Title VII claim of employment discrimination. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on recent authoritative decisions. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 9, 1985 ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1986-11-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 813 F.2d 400 Docket: 85-2135

    Original Title

    Arthur W. Bradley v. John F. Lehman, Jr., Secretary of the Navy, and Dan Strickler, Robert Rish, Carl Costanzo, Robert Fountain and Department of the Navy, 813 F.2d 400, 4th Cir. (1986)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1986 in which Arthur Bradley appealed a district court's ruling in favor of the Secretary of the Navy on a Title VII claim of employment discrimination. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on recent authoritative decisions. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 9, 1985 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from 1986 in which Arthur Bradley appealed a district court's ruling in favor of the Secretary of the Navy on a Title VII claim of employment discrimination. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on recent authoritative decisions. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning provided by the district court in its August 9, 1985 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    813 F.

    2d 400
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Arthur W. BRADLEY, Appellant,
    v.
    John F. LEHMAN, Jr., Secretary of the Navy, Appellee,
    and
    Dan Strickler, Robert Rish, Carl Costanzo, Robert Fountain
    and Department of the Navy, Defendants.
    No. 85-2135.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 26, 1986.
    Decided Nov. 26, 1986.

    Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.


    Arthur W. Bradley, appellant pro se.
    John W. Toothman, U.S. Department of Justice, for appellee.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from that court's order, granting judgment in favor of the defendant pursuant to
    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, is without
    merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively,
    we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the
    reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Lehman, C/A No. 84-1276 (E.D.Va.,
    Aug. 9, 1985).

    AFFIRMED.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like