Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wilbur M. Langley Frances F. Langley v. Alan D. Pierce, M.D., 993 F.2d 36, 4th Cir. (1993)
Wilbur M. Langley Frances F. Langley v. Alan D. Pierce, M.D., 993 F.2d 36, 4th Cir. (1993)
Wilbur M. Langley Frances F. Langley v. Alan D. Pierce, M.D., 993 F.2d 36, 4th Cir. (1993)
2d 36
Ellis I. Kahn, Justin Simon Kahn, Solomon, Kahn, Budman & Stricker,
Charleston, SC, for appellants.
James D. Brice, Edwin P. Martin, Jr., Lee B. Breland, Gibbes & Clarkson,
P.A., Greenville, SC, for appellee.
ORDER OF CERTIFICATION
TO: THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUSTICES OF THE
SOUTH
United States District Court, based on diversity jurisdiction, against Dr. Pierce
that alleged malpractice in the misdiagnosis, and her husband filed a companion
action for loss of consortium.
2
Defendant Pierce filed a motion for summary judgment based on the statute of
repose of six years contained in S.C.Code Ann. 15-3-545 (Law.Coop.Supp.1992). The defendant did not argue that the statute of limitations of
three years barred the claim because the parties agreed that Mrs. Langley had
three years after her discovery, in 1991, of the missed diagnosis to bring her suit
under the statute of limitations as distinguished from the statute of repose.
However, the district court relied on the statute of repose, also contained in
section 15-3-545, and granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment.
An appeal to this court followed.
Appellee contends that the tolling provision of section 15-3-30 applies only to
the statute of limitations contained in section 15-3-545(B) and not to the statute
of repose. Appellee relies on Dandy v. American Laundry Mach., Inc., 301 S.C.
24, 389 S.E.2d 866 (1990); Hoffman v. Powell, 298 S.C. 338, 380 S.E.2d 821
(1989); Smith v. Smith, 291 S.C. 420, 354 S.E.2d 36 (1987); Harris v. Dunlap,
285 S.C. 226, 328 S.E.2d 908 (1985); and Cutino v. Ramsey, 285 S.C. 74, 328
S.E.2d 72 (1985).
QUESTIONS
6
certify to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for decision the question in this
case under S.C.App.Ct.R. 228.
7
Was
the statute of repose contained in S.C.Code Ann. 15-3-545 (Law.Coop.Supp.1992) tolled by S.C.Code Ann. 15-3-30 (Law. Co-op.1976) when Dr.
Pierce moved from South Carolina in 1984?
8
This certification is made with the concurrence of Judge WIDENER and Judge
NIEMEYER.
Mrs. Frances Langley died after the commencement of this action, but at the
time of oral argument no party had been substituted. Her husband, Wilbur
Langley, has been a party to this action since its filing