Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Fleming v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Derek Fleming's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that denied Fleming's petition and motion based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's decisions. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Fleming v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Derek Fleming's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that denied Fleming's petition and motion based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's decisions. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-03-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7420

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Derek Fleming's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that denied Fleming's petition and motion based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's decisions. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Fleming v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Derek Fleming's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings that denied Fleming's petition and motion based on the reasoning provided in the lower court's decisions. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7420

    DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden, FCI Petersburg,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-01-582-2)

    Submitted:

    February 7, 2003

    Decided:

    March 12, 2003

    Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit


    Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se.


    Michael R. Smythers,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Derek Marquis Fleming, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the
    district

    courts

    order

    accepting

    the

    magistrate

    judges

    recommendation to deny relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.


    2241 (2000), and the courts order denying his motion filed under
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).
    reversible error.
    district court.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Fleming v. Brooks, No. CA-01-582-2 (E.D. Va.

    June 21, 2002 & July 19, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like