Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shafer v. Ellis, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Phillip Mark Shafer's appeal of the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7689A

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Phillip Mark Shafer's appeal of the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Shafer v. Ellis, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Phillip Mark Shafer's appeal of the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7689

    PHILLIP MARK SHAFER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CHRISTINE ELLIS, Individually
    Ethics Commissioner,

    &

    Officially;

    DANA

    MAYLON,

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
    Judge. (8:08-cv-00482-PJM)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2010

    Decided:

    June 4, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Phillip Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district courts order
    dismissing

    without

    complaint.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    error.

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2006)

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Shafer v. Ellis, No. 8:08-cv-00482-PJM (D. Md.

    Feb. 29, 2008).


    facts

    prejudice

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like