Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Asmar v. Cuffy, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Darryl Asmar filed a Bivens action against officials at the Federal Correctional Institution in Morgantown, West Virginia alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Asmar appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Asmar v. Cuffy, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Darryl Asmar filed a Bivens action against officials at the Federal Correctional Institution in Morgantown, West Virginia alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Asmar appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6532

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Darryl Asmar filed a Bivens action against officials at the Federal Correctional Institution in Morgantown, West Virginia alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Asmar appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Asmar v. Cuffy, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Darryl Asmar filed a Bivens action against officials at the Federal Correctional Institution in Morgantown, West Virginia alleging constitutional violations. The district court denied relief and Asmar appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6532

    DARRYL ASMAR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ROBIN CUFFY, Director Food Services, FCI
    Morgantown; LESLIE R. BILOTTI, Cook Supervisor, FCI Morgantown; BRENDA BARRETT, Health
    Services Director, FCI Morgantown; WILLIAM
    THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-95-73-1)
    Submitted:

    December 12, 1996

    Decided:

    December 18, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Darryl Asmar, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Michael Flatley, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his complaint brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
    Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Asmar v. Cuffy, No. CA-95-73-1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 22,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like