Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Quinn v. Franklin Cnty BD Sup, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Samuel Quinn appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the Franklin County Board of Supervisors as frivolous. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Quinn's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit states that unpublished opinions are not binding precedent and the court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were clear enough in the documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-02-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-2440

    Original Title

    Quinn v. Franklin Cnty Bd Sup, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Samuel Quinn appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the Franklin County Board of Supervisors as frivolous. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Quinn's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit states that unpublished opinions are not binding precedent and the court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were clear enough in the documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Quinn v. Franklin Cnty BD Sup, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Samuel Quinn appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the Franklin County Board of Supervisors as frivolous. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Quinn's appeal to also be frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court. The unpublished opinion from the Fourth Circuit states that unpublished opinions are not binding precedent and the court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were clear enough in the documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-2440

    SAMUEL D. QUINN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-97-695-R)
    Submitted:

    January 22, 1998

    Decided:

    February 3, 1998

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Samuel D. Quinn, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Samuel D. Quinn appeals the district court's order dismissing
    his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (West 1994
    & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we
    dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Quinn v. Franklin
    Cnty Board of Supervisors, No. CA-97-695-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 15,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like