Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Miller, 4th Cir. (2004)
United States v. Miller, 4th Cir. (2004)
United States v. Miller, 4th Cir. (2004)
No. 04-6917
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-101)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Johnny
Bernard
Miller
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
remand in part.
In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of
appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment.
Fed. R. App. P.
4(b)(1)(A); see United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th
Cir. 2000) (holding that 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature
and ten-day appeal period applies).
Fed. R. App. P.
4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).
These time periods are mandatory and jurisdictional.
United
expired
on
February
13,
2004.
See
Fed.
R.
App.
P.
the
ten-day
period
expired
but
within
the
thirty-day
Because
the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period,
we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine
whether Miller has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting
an extension of the ten-day appeal period applicable to the order
denying reconsideration. The record, as supplemented, will then be
returned to this court for further consideration of Millers appeal
from the denial of the motion to reconsider.
The thirtieth day fell on Sunday, March 14, 2004. Thus, the
excusable neglect period expired on Monday, March 15. See Fed. R.
App. P. 26(a)(3).
- 3 -
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART AND REMANDED IN PART
- 4 -