Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Saiyed V., 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus seeking to have court reporters transcribe and file transcripts from various hearings in his district court case. The appeals court denied the petition because the petitioner failed to show he had a clear right to the relief or that no other remedies were available. While allowing the petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis, the court determined argument was not necessary and denied the writ of mandamus.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-535

    Original Title

    Saiyed v., 4th Cir. (1996)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus seeking to have court reporters transcribe and file transcripts from various hearings in his district court case. The appeals court denied the petition because the petitioner failed to show he had a clear right to the relief or that no other remedies were available. While allowing the petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis, the court determined argument was not necessary and denied the writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Saiyed V., 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus seeking to have court reporters transcribe and file transcripts from various hearings in his district court case. The appeals court denied the petition because the petitioner failed to show he had a clear right to the relief or that no other remedies were available. While allowing the petitioner to proceed in forma pauperis, the court determined argument was not necessary and denied the writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-535

    In Re: ABDUL SAIYED,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-86-19)


    Submitted:

    September 20, 1996

    Decided:

    October 1, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Abdul Saiyed, Petitioner Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to
    have this court order the court reporters to transcribe and file in
    the district court, transcripts of his initial hearing, detention
    hearing, arraignment, suppression hearing, opening and closing
    statements, and sentencing hearing. Petitioner failed to show that
    he has a clear right to the relief sought and that no other remedy
    is available. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138
    (4th Cir. 1988); In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th
    Cir. 1979). While we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
    deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like