Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sutton v. Memmelaar, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    George Sutton appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several government officials and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed both orders, finding no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-05-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7707

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Sutton appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several government officials and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed both orders, finding no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Sutton v. Memmelaar, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Sutton appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several government officials and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed both orders, finding no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7707

    GEORGE RANDOLPH SUTTON, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    J. MEMMELAAR, Lieutenant, SBI Drug Detective;
    MIKE K. HORSTMAN, SBI Drug Detective; JERRY
    MOZINGO, IRS State Official; C. B. VICKORY,
    District Attorney,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (CA-05-257-BO)

    Submitted: May 16, 2006

    Decided: May 19, 2006

    Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    George Randolph Sutton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    George Sutton, Jr. appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his
    subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
    and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm both orders

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Sutton v.

    Memmelaar, No. 5:05-CT-257-BO (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2005); Sutton v.


    Memmelaar, No. 5:05-CT-257-BO (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2005). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like