Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Puryear, 4th Cir. (2006)
United States v. Puryear, 4th Cir. (2006)
No. 04-4541
No. 04-4546
No. 04-4547
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham.
James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-03-474)
Submitted:
Decided:
March 1, 2006
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Erika Puryear, David Leeds, and Ira Mount pled guilty to
one count of possession of stolen mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
1708 (2000).
the
district
court
treated
the
federal
sentencing
We affirm
- 3 -
review
for
advisory.
guideline
issues),
thereby
making
the
guidelines
Booker,
courts
must
calculate
the
appropriate
outside the guideline range, the court must state its reasons for
doing so.
Id. at 547
(citing Booker, 543 U.S. at ___, 125 S. Ct. at 769 (Breyer, J.,
opinion of the Court)).
Here, the district court sentenced Appellants under the
mandatory federal sentencing guidelines and established a total
offense level by determining amount of loss, number of victims
involved,
and
equipment.
whether
The
the
resulting
Defendants
guideline
possessed
ranges
device-making
exceeded
those
- 4 -
and
have
found
none.
Accordingly,
although
we
affirm
the
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
AFFIRMED IN PART,
VACATED IN PART,
AND REMANDED
- 5 -