Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Pierce v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Ricky Pierce filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Pierce appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, denying Pierce relief on his § 1983 complaint based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-11-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6592

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ricky Pierce filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Pierce appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, denying Pierce relief on his § 1983 complaint based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Pierce v. Jones, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ricky Pierce filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two defendants which was denied by the district court. Pierce appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling, denying Pierce relief on his § 1983 complaint based on the reasoning in the district court's opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6592

    RICKY A. PIERCE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PEGGY JONES; DEBORAH ADLES,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District
    Judge. (CA-94-68-5-BO)
    Submitted:

    October 31, 1996

    Decided:

    November 20, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Clark Dalton, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pierce v. Jones,
    No. CA-94-68-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like