Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shaw v. Churdar, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Oscar Shaw's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Shaw appealed the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-2119

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Oscar Shaw's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Shaw appealed the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    16 views2 pages

    Shaw v. Churdar, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Oscar Shaw's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Shaw appealed the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-2119

    OSCAR L. SHAW,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    DOUGLAS A. CHURDAR, PC Law Firm; DAVID
    Attorney Nationwide; GARRISON HILL, Judge,

    T.

    RHENEY,

    Esq.

    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (6:09-cv-02149-HFF)

    Submitted:

    June 24, 2010

    Decided:

    June 29, 2010

    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Oscar L. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Mary A. Giorgi, Luanne Lambert


    Runge, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Oscar
    accepting

    the

    L.

    Shaw

    appeals

    recommendation

    of

    the
    the

    district

    courts

    magistrate

    judge

    order
    and

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See Shaw v. Churdar, No. 6:09-cv-02149-

    HFF (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like