Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Threatt, 4th Cir. (2009)
United States v. Threatt, 4th Cir. (2009)
United States v. Threatt, 4th Cir. (2009)
No. 08-4444
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:06-cr-00417-FDW-1)
Submitted:
Before WILLIAMS,
Judges.
Chief
Judge,
Decided:
and
TRAXLER
and
KING,
Circuit
PER CURIAM:
Stacy
Arthaniel
Threatt
appeals
from
his
288-month
procedurally
unreasonable
because
the
court
failed
to
We
affirm.
When
imposing
sentence,
court
must
consider
the
the
court
explicitly
stated
that
it
reviewed
all
Id.
the
during
its
imposition
of
sentence.
Regarding
the
past
criminal
continued
employment,
conduct,
and
stated
noted
that
Threatts
Threatt
had
success
in
incredible
the motion for a variance sentence, the court relied upon the
violent nature of the charged offense, Threatts career offender
status, the need to protect the public from Threatt, and the
2
drug
treatment
court
noted
employment
inherent
that,
history,
in
due
he
to
longer
sentence.
Threatts
possessed
both
age,
the
Finally,
education,
ability
and
the
and
the
find
that
the
district
court
did
not
abuse
its
Accordingly,