Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Craig v. United States, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant, Robert Calvin Craig Jr., appealed a district court order dismissing his action for failure to plainly state his claims. However, the Fourth Circuit found that the district court's dismissal order was not a final appealable order or an appealable interlocutory order. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal as interlocutory and denied the appellant's motion to stay the proceedings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Craig v. United States, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant, Robert Calvin Craig Jr., appealed a district court order dismissing his action for failure to plainly state his claims. However, the Fourth Circuit found that the district court's dismissal order was not a final appealable order or an appealable interlocutory order. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal as interlocutory and denied the appellant's motion to stay the proceedings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6008

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant, Robert Calvin Craig Jr., appealed a district court order dismissing his action for failure to plainly state his claims. However, the Fourth Circuit found that the district court's dismissal order was not a final appealable order or an appealable interlocutory order. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal as interlocutory and denied the appellant's motion to stay the proceedings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Craig v. United States, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant, Robert Calvin Craig Jr., appealed a district court order dismissing his action for failure to plainly state his claims. However, the Fourth Circuit found that the district court's dismissal order was not a final appealable order or an appealable interlocutory order. Therefore, the Fourth Circuit dismissed the appeal as interlocutory and denied the appellant's motion to stay the proceedings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6008

    ROBERT CALVIN CRAIG, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE 113TH FEDERAL
    DIVISION (En Banc); JAYME MILLER, USM; TOM
    ASHECRAFT, U.S. Atty.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District
    Judge. (CA-94-431-3-MU)
    Submitted:

    May 16, 1996

    Decided:

    June 27, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert Calvin Craig, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing this
    action for failure to plainly state his claims. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.
    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
    U.S.C. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral
    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here
    appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
    or collateral order.
    We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process. The motion to stay is denied.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like