Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Franklin D. Cale v. E. L. Paderick, 546 F.2d 577, 4th Cir. (1976)
Franklin D. Cale v. E. L. Paderick, 546 F.2d 577, 4th Cir. (1976)
2d 577
This civil rights action was brought by a Virginia prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
1983, claiming (1) that he was transferred to segregation without due process
of law, and (2) that following his conviction on the criminal charge against
him, he was not immediately released from segregation into the general
population of the penitentiary. After trial the district court dismissed the
petition and granted judgment for the defendants. We affirm.
Petitioner's second claim is that the prison superintendent should be held liable
for his failure to release him into the general population of the prison following
his conviction. The district court found as a fact that the defendant
superintendent, as soon as he learned of petitioner's conviction, ordered him
released from segregation. Moreover, the petitioner himself made no demand
for his release from segregation, even though he spoke to the defendant
superintendent on several occasions. Under these circumstances there is no
basis for a judgment against the defendant superintendent who acted, according
to the findings of the district court, at all times in good faith. Such a finding
constitutes a valid defense to a 1983 action. Pierson v. Ray (1967) 386 U.S.
547, 557, 87 S.Ct. 1213, 18 L.Ed.2d 288; Hill v. Rowland (4th Cir. 1973) 474
F.2d 1374, 1376-77; Hoitt v. Vitek (1st Cir. 1974) 497 F.2d 598, 600.
AFFIRMED.
The record of this hearing was lost, but a reconstructed ICC report is a part of
the record. The district court in finding that there was a hearing said "(t)o
conclude that there was no hearing I would have to find that the defendants
Spann, Kennedy and Moore and the witness Greer made this up out of whole
cloth that there was no I.C.C. hearing, and I do not believe they made it up. I
think there was a hearing."