Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Daniel Whisenant v. William C. Duncil, Warden, 902 F.2d 30, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Daniel Whisenant of a district court's refusal of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal lacked merit. Therefore, the court denied a certificate of probable cause for the appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in Whisenant v. Duncil, C/A No. 90-144-3. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-04-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 902 F.2d 30 Docket: 90-6042

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Daniel Whisenant of a district court's refusal of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal lacked merit. Therefore, the court denied a certificate of probable cause for the appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in Whisenant v. Duncil, C/A No. 90-144-3. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Daniel Whisenant v. William C. Duncil, Warden, 902 F.2d 30, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes an appeal from Daniel Whisenant of a district court's refusal of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal lacked merit. Therefore, the court denied a certificate of probable cause for the appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in Whisenant v. Duncil, C/A No. 90-144-3. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    902 F.

    2d 30
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Daniel WHISENANT, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    William C. DUNCIL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 90-6042.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 2, 1990.
    Decided April 16, 1990.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of
    West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge.
    (C/A No.90-144-3)
    Daniel Whisenant, appellant pro se.
    S.D.W.Va.
    DISMISSED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Daniel Whisenant seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas
    corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the
    district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly,
    we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court. Whisenant v. Duncil, C/A No. 90-144-3

    (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 12, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like