Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Willie David Brown's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Brown appealed the district court's ruling, but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons stated by the district court in denying Brown's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Willie David Brown's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Brown appealed the district court's ruling, but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons stated by the district court in denying Brown's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-11-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8195

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Willie David Brown's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Brown appealed the district court's ruling, but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons stated by the district court in denying Brown's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Willie David Brown's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Brown appealed the district court's ruling, but the Court of Appeals found no reversible error after reviewing the record. The Court of Appeals adopted the reasons stated by the district court in denying Brown's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8195

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WILLIE DAVID BROWN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger,
    District Judge. (3:93-cr-00264-MR-1)

    Submitted:

    October 29, 2010

    Decided:

    November 12, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Willie David Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


    David Alan Brown, Sr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Willie David Brown appeals the district courts order
    denying

    reduction

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    of

    pursuant

    to

    18

    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    00264-MR-1

    sentence

    (W.D.N.C.

    United States v. Brown, No. 3:93-cr-

    Aug.

    4,

    2009).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like