Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Tate, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Tom Aaron Tate appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-05-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6088

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tom Aaron Tate appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Tate, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tom Aaron Tate appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials and argument would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6088

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    TOM AARON TATE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-94-147, CA-99-384-3-MU)

    Submitted:

    May 17, 2001

    Decided:

    May 25, 2001

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Tom Aaron Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tom Aaron Tate appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    United States v. Tate, Nos. CR-94-147; CA-99-384-

    3-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like