Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Short v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Harvey P. Short filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various defendants including state officials and agencies. The district court denied relief to Short. Short appealed. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Short v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views3 pages
    Harvey P. Short filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various defendants including state officials and agencies. The district court denied relief to Short. Short appealed. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7001

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Harvey P. Short filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various defendants including state officials and agencies. The district court denied relief to Short. Short appealed. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views3 pages

    Short v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Harvey P. Short filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various defendants including state officials and agencies. The district court denied relief to Short. Short appealed. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court determined that oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7001

    HARVEY P. SHORT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN DOE; PRESSIE BOYKIN, Probation Agent;
    AUDREY E. MELBOURNE; WHITE, Assistant State
    Attorney;
    JAY
    CREECH,
    Assistant
    State's
    Attorney; PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY GOVERNMENT;
    GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; WARDEN
    SMITH; RICHARD A. LANHAM, JR.; SECRETARY OF
    PUBLIC SAFETY, and Correctional Services;
    WILLIAM D. MISSOURI; WILLIAM H. MCCULLOUGH;
    ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.; PRINCE GEORGE'S
    COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN DOE, State
    Trooper #1; JOHN DOE, State Trooper #2;
    WILLIAM DONALD SHAFFER, Governor; PARRIS N.
    GLENDENING, Governor; BISHOP L. ROBINSON; JANE
    DOE, Commitment Office Manager; US AIR GROUP,
    INCORPORATED; SHERIFF PENDERGRASS; CAPTAIN
    HARVEY; PATUXENT INSTITUTION, Superintendent;
    MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL TRAINING CENTER, Warden;
    MARYLAND
    RECEPTION,
    DIAGNOSTIC
    AND
    CLASSIFICATION INSTITUTE; SUPER FRESH FOOD
    MARKETS OF MARYLAND, INCORPORATED; 7-ELEVEN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
    (8:06-cv-02217-DKC)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2007

    Decided:

    October 25, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF


    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Harvey

    P.

    Short

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Short v. Doe,

    No. 8:06-cv-02217-DKC (D. Md. June 26, 2007).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    are

    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument


    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like