Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mills v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Albert Curtis Mills' appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court denied Mills a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-12-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7318

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Albert Curtis Mills' appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court denied Mills a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Mills v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Albert Curtis Mills' appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court denied Mills a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's opinion. The appeals court decided the case without oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7318

    ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
    OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA00-1961-DKC)

    Submitted:

    November 30, 2000

    Decided:

    December 7, 2000

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Albert Curtis Mills seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Mills v. Corcoran, No. CA-00-

    1961-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like