Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Angelo Ham v. Dennis Patterson, 4th Cir. (2012)
Angelo Ham v. Dennis Patterson, 4th Cir. (2012)
No. 12-6991
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (6:11-cv-00853-JMC)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Angelo
B.
Ham
appeals
the
district
courts
order
On appeal,
file objections.
United States v. Smith, 395 F.3d 516, 519 (4th Cir. 2005)
have
reviewed
the
record
and
conclude
that
the
Ham
failed
to
state
constitutional
violation
in
his
The
most
specific
description
of
the
injury
Ham
(E.R. 6).
Ham does not specify what privileges were taken away as a result
of the disciplinary hearing.
Ham
does
not
constitutional right.
sufficiently
allege
the
denial
of
any
Hams complaint.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED