Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Howard v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    Robert P. Howard appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit also denied Howard's motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-10-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6678

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert P. Howard appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit also denied Howard's motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Howard v. Corcoran, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert P. Howard appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit also denied Howard's motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6678

    ROBERT P. HOWARD,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
    STATE OF MARYLAND,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-971467-L)

    Submitted:

    September 29, 2000

    Decided:

    October 18, 2000

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Robert P. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
    MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert P. Howard appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a

    certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Howard v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-

    1467-L (D. Md. Apr. 13, 2000).

    We deny Howards motion for prepa-

    ration of transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like