Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Holley v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Tyrone Holley's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Holley's petition. The Fourth Circuit declined to consider new claims raised for the first time on appeal and dismissed the case without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Holley v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Tyrone Holley's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Holley's petition. The Fourth Circuit declined to consider new claims raised for the first time on appeal and dismissed the case without oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-08-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6660

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Tyrone Holley's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Holley's petition. The Fourth Circuit declined to consider new claims raised for the first time on appeal and dismissed the case without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Holley v. Beck, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Tyrone Holley's appeal of a district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Holley's petition. The Fourth Circuit declined to consider new claims raised for the first time on appeal and dismissed the case without oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6660

    TYRONE HOLLEY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    THEODIS BECK,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (CA-00-567-1)

    Submitted:

    August 23, 2001

    Decided:

    August 30, 2001

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Tyrone Holley, Appellant Pro Se.
    Clarence Joe DelForge, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tyrone Holley appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court.

    Holley v. Beck, No. CA-00-567-1 (M.D.N.C. filed

    Mar. 26, 2001; entered Mar. 27, 2001).

    We decline to consider the

    claims that Holley asserts for the first time on appeal.


    v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).

    See Muth

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like