Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Burgess, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Sherrie Morton Burgess of the denial of her motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7031

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Sherrie Morton Burgess of the denial of her motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    United States v. Burgess, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Sherrie Morton Burgess of the denial of her motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7031

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SHERRIE MORTON BURGESS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-97-18, CA-00-990-1)

    Submitted:

    September 6, 2001

    Decided:

    September 14, 2001

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Sherrie Morton Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Sherrie Morton Burgess seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find


    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court.

    See United States v. Burgess, Nos. CR-97-18; CA-00-990-1

    (M.D.N.C. June 18, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like