Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United States v. Felipe Hernandez-Hernandez, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Felipe Hernandez-Hernandez, 4th Cir. (2014)
United States v. Felipe Hernandez-Hernandez, 4th Cir. (2014)
No. 13-4904
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:13-cr-00119-HEH-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Felipe
de
Jesus
Hernandez-Hernandez,
native
and
count
of
illegal
conviction
of
(b)(1) (2012).
reentry
felony,
in
after
violation
prior
of
removal
following
U.S.C.
1326(a),
Hernandez-Hernandez
procedurally
erred
by
contends
refusing
that
to
the
consider
district
his
On
court
arguments
deferential
States,
552
abuse-of-discretion
U.S.
38,
41
(2007).
standard.
Gall
Procedural
v.
United
reasonableness
We
calculated
3553(a)
parties,
must
the
assess
advisory
factors,
and
whether
Guidelines
analyzed
sufficiently
the
any
district
range,
arguments
explained
the
court
properly
considered
presented
selected
by
the
the
sentence.
Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; see also United States v. Lynn, 592 F.3d
572, 576 (4th Cir. 2010) ([A]n individualized explanation must
2
v.
Hernandez-Villanueva,
473
F.3d
118,
123
United
(4th
Cir.
2007).
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find that
the
district
counsels
court
properly
arguments
regarding
heard,
considered,
3553(a)(6).
and
The
weighed
court
also
procedural
court.
legal
before
error
and
affirm
the
Accordingly, we find
judgment
of
the
district
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED