Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Parsons, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    19 views2 pages
    Randy Parsons appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's order based on the reasoning in the lower court. The appellate court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without requiring oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-11-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7211

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Randy Parsons appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's order based on the reasoning in the lower court. The appellate court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without requiring oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    19 views2 pages

    United States v. Parsons, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Randy Parsons appealed a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's order based on the reasoning in the lower court. The appellate court determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without requiring oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7211

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RANDY CHESTER PARSONS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
    District Judge. (CR-95-77-BO)

    Submitted:

    November 8, 2001

    Decided:

    November 21, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Randy Chester Parsons, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Randy Chester Parsons appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. 3582 (West 2000).
    have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    Accord-

    ingly, we affirm the courts order based upon the reasoning of the
    district court. United States v. Parsons, No. CR-95-77-BO (E.D.N.C.
    May 24, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like