Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Swayzer v. US Dept of Defense, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Thinemar Swayzer appealed the district court's dismissal of her discrimination lawsuit under the Rehabilitation Act against the U.S. Department of Defense. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its March 2001 opinion dismissing the case. The appeals panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Swayzer v. US Dept of Defense, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Thinemar Swayzer appealed the district court's dismissal of her discrimination lawsuit under the Rehabilitation Act against the U.S. Department of Defense. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its March 2001 opinion dismissing the case. The appeals panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1624

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Thinemar Swayzer appealed the district court's dismissal of her discrimination lawsuit under the Rehabilitation Act against the U.S. Department of Defense. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its March 2001 opinion dismissing the case. The appeals panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Swayzer v. US Dept of Defense, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Thinemar Swayzer appealed the district court's dismissal of her discrimination lawsuit under the Rehabilitation Act against the U.S. Department of Defense. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in its March 2001 opinion dismissing the case. The appeals panel determined that oral arguments were not necessary because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1624

    THINEMAR SWAYZER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District
    Judge. (99-1407-A)

    Submitted:

    November 27, 2001

    Decided:

    December 12, 2001

    Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James A. Endicott, Jr., Harker Heights, Texas, for Appellant.
    Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney, Dennis E. Szybala, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Thinemar Swayzer appeals the district courts order dismissing
    her civil action alleging discrimination under the Rehabilitation
    Act.

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion

    and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-

    soning of the district court.

    See Swayzer v. United States Dept

    of Defense, No. 99-1407-A (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 6, 2001; entered


    Mar. 7, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like