Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Parker v. Danzig, Sec, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's granting of summary judgment for the defendant in a sexual discrimination case brought under Title VII. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1737

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's granting of summary judgment for the defendant in a sexual discrimination case brought under Title VII. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Parker v. Danzig, Sec, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished, per curiam opinion affirming the district court's granting of summary judgment for the defendant in a sexual discrimination case brought under Title VII. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1737

    DONNA PARKER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RICHARD DANZIG, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
    (CA-00-412-2)

    Submitted:

    November 28, 2001

    Decided:

    December 12, 2001

    Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    J. Gray Lawrence, Jr., FAGGERT & FRIEDEN, P.C., Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellant. Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney,
    Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Donna Lee Parker appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment to Defendant on her claim of sexual discrimination
    filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a)(1) (1994).

    We have re-

    viewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.
    30, 2001).

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    Parker v. Danzig, No. CA-00-412-2 (E.D. Va. Mar.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like