Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Booker, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Jerry Booker appealed the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors. It denied Booker's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Booker did not demonstrate grounds for overturning his conviction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-12-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7365

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jerry Booker appealed the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors. It denied Booker's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Booker did not demonstrate grounds for overturning his conviction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Booker, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jerry Booker appealed the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decision and found no errors. It denied Booker's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Booker did not demonstrate grounds for overturning his conviction. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7365

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JERRY A. BOOKER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-98-452-A, CA-01-914)

    Submitted:

    November 29, 2001

    Decided:

    December 10, 2001

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jerry A. Booker, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Dean Kromberg, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jerry A. Booker appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2001).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

    ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district


    court.

    See United States v. Booker, Nos. CR-98-452-A; CA-01-914

    (E.D. Va. June 19, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like