Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Roderick English v. Fazal Khan, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Roderick English filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various defendants. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Roderick English v. Fazal Khan, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Roderick English filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various defendants. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6688

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Roderick English filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various defendants. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Roderick English v. Fazal Khan, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Roderick English filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against various defendants. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision for the reasons stated. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6688

    RODERICK ENGLISH,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    FAZAL KHAN; RICHARD S. JOHNSON; LPN MICHELLE D. FOX; SYLVIA
    ROBERTS; AMORET FLOYD; JOANN BOARDS; ADRIENNE N. LOGAN;
    TERRIE LEONARD; RN POWELL; EILEEN DELANY; DONNA LODANIEL;
    T. BENJAMIN ARTHUR E. MCLAMB; ANN M. DWYER; PRAVIN R.
    PATEL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Aiken.
    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:13-cv-02857-JFA)

    Submitted:

    July 24, 2014

    Before FLOYD and


    Circuit Judge.

    THACKER,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    July 29, 2014

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Roderick Jerome English appeals the district courts
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    English

    2014).
    legal
    before

    v.

    Khan,

    1:13-cv-02857-JFA

    (D.S.C.

    Apr.

    1,

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like