Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Pernell Pittman v. Michael Wade, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Pernell Davis Pittman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Michael L. Wade, Sheriff of Henrico County Jail Department, and other defendants for failure to prosecute. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Pernell Pittman v. Michael Wade, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Pernell Davis Pittman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Michael L. Wade, Sheriff of Henrico County Jail Department, and other defendants for failure to prosecute. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6828

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Pernell Davis Pittman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Michael L. Wade, Sheriff of Henrico County Jail Department, and other defendants for failure to prosecute. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Pernell Pittman v. Michael Wade, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Pernell Davis Pittman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Michael L. Wade, Sheriff of Henrico County Jail Department, and other defendants for failure to prosecute. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6828

    PERNELL DAVIS PITTMAN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL L. WADE, Sheriff, Henrico County Jail Department;
    JOHN DOE(S); JANE DOE(S),
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    John A. Gibney, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:14-cv-00016-JAG)

    Submitted:

    July 24, 2014

    Before FLOYD and


    Circuit Judge.

    THACKER,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    July 29, 2014

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Pernell Davis Pittman, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Pernell

    Davis

    Pittman

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012)


    complaint for failure to prosecute.
    and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    reasons stated by the district court.

    Pittman v. Wade, No.

    3:14-cv-00016-JAG (E.D. Va. May 15, 2014).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like