Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Yancey v. Rascoe, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Nathan Yancey, a Virginia inmate, filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 USC 1915A. Yancey appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-02-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7955

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nathan Yancey, a Virginia inmate, filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 USC 1915A. Yancey appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Yancey v. Rascoe, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Nathan Yancey, a Virginia inmate, filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court under 28 USC 1915A. Yancey appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7955

    NATHAN J. YANCEY, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    V. RASCOE, Correctional Officer; I. PECK,
    Officer-in-Charge, Correctional Officer Supervisor; W. EPPERSON, Lieutenant, Correctional
    Officer Supervisor; MS. LAWRENCES, Inmate
    Hearings Officer; J. EVERETTE, Housing Unit
    Manager/Institutional Review Officer; MS.
    CARABELLO-FERNANDEZ, Housing Unit Manager; D.
    GARRAGHTY, Head Warden/Superintendent,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (CA-01-1498-AM)

    Submitted:

    February 14, 2002

    Decided:

    February 27, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Nathan J. Yancey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathan J. Yancey, Jr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp.
    2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 2001).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

    the district court.

    See Yancey v. Rascoe, No. CA-01-1498-AM (E.D.

    Va. Nov. 5, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like