Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Wade Hankins, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Wade Temple Hankins' motion for jail credit on his federal sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 16, 2014 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6290

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Wade Temple Hankins' motion for jail credit on his federal sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 16, 2014 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Wade Hankins, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Wade Temple Hankins' motion for jail credit on his federal sentence. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore affirmed the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in its January 16, 2014 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6290

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    WADE TEMPLE HANKINS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (7:05-cr-00025-F-1)

    Submitted:

    July 29, 2014

    Decided:

    July 31, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Wade Temple Hankins, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley,


    Edward D. Gray, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States
    Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Wade Temple Hankins appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for jail credit on his federal sentence.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United

    (E.D.N.C.

    Jan.

    States

    16,

    2014).

    v.

    Hankins,
    We

    No.

    dispense

    7:05-cr-00025-F-1

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like