Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Powell v. Keller, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to defendants in a civil rights case brought by Rose Powell. Powell had alleged violations related to the forfeiture of her real property. The appellate court found no reversible error after reviewing the record and reasoning of the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Powell v. Keller, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to defendants in a civil rights case brought by Rose Powell. Powell had alleged violations related to the forfeiture of her real property. The appellate court found no reversible error after reviewing the record and reasoning of the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-02-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-2116

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to defendants in a civil rights case brought by Rose Powell. Powell had alleged violations related to the forfeiture of her real property. The appellate court found no reversible error after reviewing the record and reasoning of the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views3 pages

    Powell v. Keller, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment to defendants in a civil rights case brought by Rose Powell. Powell had alleged violations related to the forfeiture of her real property. The appellate court found no reversible error after reviewing the record and reasoning of the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-2116

    ROSE C. POWELL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    SHANNELL POWELL; SHAMELA POWELL; RUENALL
    FREDRICK,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    TONY A. KELLER; JORGE SOSA; JASON COY REID;
    TIMOTHY JAMES BREWER; LARRY WATERS; GRETCHEN
    C.F. SHAPPERT; RICHARD L. VOORHEES; CARL HORN,
    III, Magistrate Judge; GREGORY A. FOREST;
    JAYME MILLER; UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE;
    CATAWBA COUNTY; CATAWBA COUNTY BOARD OF
    COMMISSIONERS; SHERIFF OF CATAWBA COUNTY;
    CATAWBA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; COLDWELL
    BANKER BOYD & HASSELL, INCORPORATED REALTORS;
    ELVALORIE MATTHEWS; RICHARD MCDONNELL; MARK T.
    CALLOWAY; NEWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; CONOVER
    POLICE DEPARTMENT; WILLIAM A. BRAFFORD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Chief District Judge. (CA-03-160-5-MU)

    Submitted:

    February 9, 2005

    Decided: February 14, 2005

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rose C. Powell, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Robert
    Danny Mason, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC,
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Edward Laughtin Eatman, Jr.,
    Elizabeth Ann Martineau, HEDRICK, EATMAN, GARDNER & KINCHELOE,
    Charlotte, North Carolina; Scott Douglas MacLatchie, Sean Francis
    Perrin, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North
    Carolina; Jennifer Ann Youngs, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; William Anthony Navarro,
    WISHART, NORRIS, HENNINGER & PITTMAN, Charlotte, North Carolina,
    for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Rose
    granting

    C.

    summary

    Powell
    judgment

    appeals
    to

    the

    district

    defendants

    on

    her

    courts
    civil

    order
    rights

    complaint that alleged violations based upon the forfeiture of real


    property.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. See Powell v. Keller, No. CA-03-160-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24,


    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like