Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ferrell v. Amonette, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Ralph Lewis Ferrell of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. William Amonette. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on its reasoning. The court also denied Ferrell's motion for copies of his medical records and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7650

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Ralph Lewis Ferrell of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. William Amonette. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on its reasoning. The court also denied Ferrell's motion for copies of his medical records and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Ferrell v. Amonette, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding an appeal by Ralph Lewis Ferrell of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Dr. William Amonette. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on its reasoning. The court also denied Ferrell's motion for copies of his medical records and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7650

    RALPH LEWIS FERRELL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIAM AMONETTE, Dr.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-95-94-R)
    Submitted:

    January 11, 1996

    Decided:

    January 25, 1996

    Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ralph Lewis Ferrell, Appellant Pro Se. Eleanor Andrews Lasky,
    Powell M. Leitch, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Ferrell v. Amonette, No. CA-95-94-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 19,
    1995). We deny Appellant's motion for copies of his medical
    records. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like