Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Daniel King v. Justin Andrews, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Daniel King, a federal prisoner, appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petitions. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court granted King's request to proceed in forma pauperis but ruled that the district court provided adequate reasons for its decision to deny King's petitions for relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-08-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6412

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Daniel King, a federal prisoner, appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petitions. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court granted King's request to proceed in forma pauperis but ruled that the district court provided adequate reasons for its decision to deny King's petitions for relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    Daniel King v. Justin Andrews, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Daniel King, a federal prisoner, appealed a district court's denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petitions. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling. The appeals court granted King's request to proceed in forma pauperis but ruled that the district court provided adequate reasons for its decision to deny King's petitions for relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6412

    DANIEL H. KING,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge.
    (5:12-hc-02259-FL; 5:12-hc-02271-FL; 5:12-hc02288-FL)

    Submitted:

    July 29, 2014

    Decided:

    August 1, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Daniel

    H.

    King,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2241


    (2012)

    petitions.

    reversible

    error.

    We

    have

    reviewed

    Accordingly,

    the

    record

    although

    we

    and

    grant

    find

    no

    leave

    to

    proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    King v. Andrews, Nos. 5:12-hc-02259-FL;

    5:12-hc-02271-FL; 5:12-hc-02288-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2014).


    dispense

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like