Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Goglia v. US Selective Service, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    1) Andrew Goglia filed a civil action against the United States Selective Service System and the United States Department of Education that was dismissed by the district court. 2) Goglia appealed the district court's dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, believing the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-08-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1754

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Andrew Goglia filed a civil action against the United States Selective Service System and the United States Department of Education that was dismissed by the district court. 2) Goglia appealed the district court's dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, believing the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    Goglia v. US Selective Service, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Andrew Goglia filed a civil action against the United States Selective Service System and the United States Department of Education that was dismissed by the district court. 2) Goglia appealed the district court's dismissal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, believing the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1754

    ANDREW A. GOGLIA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM; UNITED
    STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-97-3986-DKC)

    Submitted:

    August 13, 1998

    Decided:

    August 31, 1998

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Andrew A. Goglia, Appellant Pro Se.
    George Levi Russell, III,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order dismissing his
    civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district courts
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Goglia v. United States Selective
    Serv. Sys., No. CA-97-3986-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 29, 1998). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like