Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    United States v. Terry McNeair, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Terry Dennard McNeair appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying McNeair's motion for sentence reduction for the reasons stated in United States v. McNeair, No. 4:96-cr-00070-WO-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Terry McNeair, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Terry Dennard McNeair appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying McNeair's motion for sentence reduction for the reasons stated in United States v. McNeair, No. 4:96-cr-00070-WO-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6343

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Terry Dennard McNeair appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying McNeair's motion for sentence reduction for the reasons stated in United States v. McNeair, No. 4:96-cr-00070-WO-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Terry McNeair, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Terry Dennard McNeair appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's ruling denying McNeair's motion for sentence reduction for the reasons stated in United States v. McNeair, No. 4:96-cr-00070-WO-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2011). The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6343

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TERRY DENNARD MCNEAIR,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (4:96-cr-00070-WO-2)

    Submitted:

    July 28, 2011

    Decided:

    August 2, 2011

    Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Terry Dennard McNeair, Appellant Pro Se.


    Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Robert Michael
    Greensboro, North

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Terry

    Dennard

    McNeair

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.


    3582

    (2006).

    reversible error.

    We

    have

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    00070-WO-2

    reviewed

    (M.D.N.C.

    United States v. McNeair, No. 4:96-cr-

    Feb.

    23,

    2011).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like