Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Taylor v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Warren Scott Taylor filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from the district court's denial of his petition and subsequent denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. As such, the appeals court denied Taylor's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-07-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6428

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Warren Scott Taylor filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from the district court's denial of his petition and subsequent denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. As such, the appeals court denied Taylor's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Taylor v. Brown, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Warren Scott Taylor filed a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 seeking relief from the district court's denial of his petition and subsequent denial of his motion for reconsideration. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the case and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. As such, the appeals court denied Taylor's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6428

    WARREN SCOTT TAYLOR,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    H. D. BROWN, Page County Magistrate Judge,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-01-912-7)

    Submitted:

    April 26, 2002

    Decided:

    July 15, 2002

    Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Warren Scott Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Warren Scott Taylor seeks to appeal the district courts
    orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A.
    2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001), and denying his motion for
    reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinions and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the


    reasoning of the district court.

    Taylor v. Brown, No. CA-01-912-7

    (W.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2002; Feb. 28, 2002).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like