Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Edmonds v. Cummings, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Andre Edmonds in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Edmonds v. Cummings, Case No. CA-01-630. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-07-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6771

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Andre Edmonds in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Edmonds v. Cummings, Case No. CA-01-630. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Edmonds v. Cummings, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Andre Edmonds in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling based on the reasoning in Edmonds v. Cummings, Case No. CA-01-630. The court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6771

    ANDRE EDMONDS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DONALD R. CUMMINGS; JAMES KEELING; PAGE TRUE;
    RUFUS FLEMINGS, Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-01-630)

    Submitted:

    July 18, 2002

    Decided:

    July 25, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Andre Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Andre Edmonds appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Edmonds v. Cummings, No. CA-01-630 (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2002).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like