Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Goodwyn v. United States, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Orrandy Goodwyn appealed the district court's dismissal of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Goodwyn v. United States, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Orrandy Goodwyn appealed the district court's dismissal of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-08-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6639

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Orrandy Goodwyn appealed the district court's dismissal of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Goodwyn v. United States, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Orrandy Goodwyn appealed the district court's dismissal of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error, affirming the lower court's ruling based on the same reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6639

    ORRANDY GOODWYN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; D. SCOTT DODRILL,
    Warden, Low Security Correctional InstitutionButner,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-02-63-5-HO)

    Submitted:

    July 19, 2002

    Decided:

    August 23, 2002

    Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Orrandy Goodwyn, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Orrandy Goodwyn seeks to appeal the district courts order
    dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (1994).

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Goodwyn v. United States, No. CA-02-63-5-HO

    (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like