Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Frazier-El, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    20 views2 pages
    1) Clinton Bernard Frazier-El appealed a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit determined that Frazier-El did not make a substantial showing that his constitutional rights were denied, so it denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7025

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Clinton Bernard Frazier-El appealed a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit determined that Frazier-El did not make a substantial showing that his constitutional rights were denied, so it denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    20 views2 pages

    United States v. Frazier-El, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Clinton Bernard Frazier-El appealed a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which allows prisoners to challenge their sentences. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasoning for denying the motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit determined that Frazier-El did not make a substantial showing that his constitutional rights were denied, so it denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7025

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CLINTON BERNARD FRAZIER-EL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William M. Nickerson, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-96-469-WMN, CA-01-3412-HNM)

    Submitted:

    September 5, 2002

    Decided:

    September 11, 2002

    Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Clinton Bernard Frazier-El, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShieldsMinnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Clinton

    Bernard

    Frazier-El

    seeks

    to

    appeal

    the

    district

    courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255


    (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that


    Frazier-El has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
    constitutional right. United States v. Frazier-El, Nos. CR-96-469WMN; CA-01-3412-HNM (D. Md. June 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a
    certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.
    2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like