Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re Whitaker V., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) Martell Whitaker filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit found that there was no undue delay by the district court. 3) The Court of Appeals denied Whitaker's petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7790

    Original Title

    In Re Whitaker v., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Martell Whitaker filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit found that there was no undue delay by the district court. 3) The Court of Appeals denied Whitaker's petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    In Re Whitaker V., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Martell Whitaker filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit found that there was no undue delay by the district court. 3) The Court of Appeals denied Whitaker's petition for a writ of mandamus.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7790

    In Re:

    MARTELL WHITAKER,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    January 9, 2003

    (CA-01-3207-B-1)

    Decided:

    January 24, 2003

    Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Martell Whitaker, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Martell Whitaker petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
    the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
    2255 (2000) motion.

    He seeks an order from this court directing

    the district court to act.

    We find there has been no undue delay

    in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition.


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like