Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • O'Neal v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Rose M. O'Neal appealed a district court's dismissal of her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint against the United States, Department of the Army, Tripler Army Medical Center, and CHAMPUS. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's dismissal based on the reasoning in its September 16, 2002 ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-01-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-2357

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rose M. O'Neal appealed a district court's dismissal of her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint against the United States, Department of the Army, Tripler Army Medical Center, and CHAMPUS. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's dismissal based on the reasoning in its September 16, 2002 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    1 views2 pages

    O'Neal v. United States, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rose M. O'Neal appealed a district court's dismissal of her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint against the United States, Department of the Army, Tripler Army Medical Center, and CHAMPUS. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's dismissal based on the reasoning in its September 16, 2002 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-2357

    ROSE M. ONEAL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF THE
    ARMY; TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER; CHAMPUS,
    Department of Defense,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CA-02-870-A)

    Submitted:

    January 16, 2003

    Decided:

    January 22, 2003

    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rose M. ONeal, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Rose

    M.

    ONeal

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    judgment

    dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. We have reviewed


    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court.

    See ONeal v. United States,

    CA-02-870-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2002).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like