Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Morris, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Bernard Morris's motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 17, 2010 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6457

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Bernard Morris's motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 17, 2010 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Morris, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Bernard Morris's motion to modify the terms of his supervised release. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its February 17, 2010 order. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6457

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    BERNARD MORRIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
    Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00055-JPB-DJJ-1)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 2010

    Decided:

    August 2, 2010

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bernard Morris, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Perri, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Bernard
    denying
    release.
    error.
    district

    his

    Morris

    motion

    to

    modify

    the

    the

    district

    terms

    of

    courts
    his

    order

    supervised

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
    court.

    United

    3:06-cr-00055-JPB-DJJ-1
    dispense

    appeals

    with

    oral

    (N.D.

    argument

    States
    W.

    Va.

    because

    v.
    Feb.
    the

    Morris,
    17,
    facts

    2010).
    and

    No.
    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like