Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Baxley v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals by Michael C. Baxley against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and various officials regarding the denial of his motion to amend his complaint in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case and the denial of relief in that case. The district court denied Baxley's motion to amend and denied relief in his § 1983 case. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Baxley v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views3 pages
    This document summarizes two appeals by Michael C. Baxley against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and various officials regarding the denial of his motion to amend his complaint in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case and the denial of relief in that case. The district court denied Baxley's motion to amend and denied relief in his § 1983 case. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-12-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6172

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes two appeals by Michael C. Baxley against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and various officials regarding the denial of his motion to amend his complaint in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case and the denial of relief in that case. The district court denied Baxley's motion to amend and denied relief in his § 1983 case. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views3 pages

    Baxley v. SC Dept Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals by Michael C. Baxley against the South Carolina Department of Corrections and various officials regarding the denial of his motion to amend his complaint in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case and the denial of relief in that case. The district court denied Baxley's motion to amend and denied relief in his § 1983 case. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6172

    MICHAEL C. BAXLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    MICHAEL W. MOORE, Commissioner; WILLIAM R.
    DAVIS, Warden; GEORGE N. MARTIN, III, Regional
    Director; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Director;
    DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER; TIM BETHEA, Inmate Representative; CAPTAIN HUGHES, Lee C.I.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 99-7460

    MICHAEL C. BAXLEY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
    MICHAEL W. MOORE, Commissioner; WILLIAM R.
    DAVIS, Warden; GEORGE N. MARTIN, III, Regional
    Director; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Director;
    CAPTAIN HUGHES, Lee C.I., DISCIPLINARY HEARING
    OFFICER; TIM BETHEA, Inmate Representative,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge; William M. Catoe, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
    (CA-98-2344-617AK)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 1999

    Decided:

    December 21, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael C. Baxley, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Turner, Jr.,
    CLARKSON, FORTSON, WALSH & RHENEY, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael C. Baxley appeals from the district courts orders:
    (1) denying his motion to amend his complaint; (2) denying relief
    on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint; and (3)
    denying his motion for reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the rec-

    ord and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Baxley v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections, No. CA-98-2344-617AK (D.S.C. Jan. 8; June 4; and Oct. 7, 1999).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like