Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Steven Donewan Carr V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Steven Donewan Carr filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed in ruling on his Rule 60(b) motion. The court denied the petition, finding no undue delay in the district court's handling of the motion. While granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the mandamus petition, determining that oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-08-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1550

    Original Title

    In re: Steven Donewan Carr v., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Steven Donewan Carr filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed in ruling on his Rule 60(b) motion. The court denied the petition, finding no undue delay in the district court's handling of the motion. While granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the mandamus petition, determining that oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    In Re: Steven Donewan Carr V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Steven Donewan Carr filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed in ruling on his Rule 60(b) motion. The court denied the petition, finding no undue delay in the district court's handling of the motion. While granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court denied the mandamus petition, determining that oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1550

    In Re:

    STEVEN DONEWAN CARR,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2014

    Before SHEDD and


    Circuit Judge.

    FLOYD,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    August 14, 2014

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Steven Donewan Carr, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven Donewan Carr petitions for a writ of mandamus,
    alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
    his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.

    He seeks an order from this

    court directing the district court to act.


    record

    does

    Accordingly,

    not

    reveal

    although

    we

    undue

    delay

    grant

    in

    leave

    pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.

    We find the present


    the

    to

    district

    proceed

    in

    court.
    forma

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like