Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Shenandoah Federal Savings & Loan Association, John N. Taylor, and David W. Ralston. The district court had adopted the bankruptcy court's proposed findings and conclusions, ruling that the objections raised by the plaintiff, Snowshoe Company, were without substance. The Fourth Circuit found that the appeal by Snowshoe Company was without merit based on its review of the record, oral arguments, and the district court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 977 F.2d 574 Docket: 91-2095

    Original Title

    In Re: Snowshoe Company, Debtor. Snowshoe Company v. Shenandoah Federal Savings & Loan Association John N. Taylor David W. Ralston, 977 F.2d 574, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Shenandoah Federal Savings & Loan Association, John N. Taylor, and David W. Ralston. The district court had adopted the bankruptcy court's proposed findings and conclusions, ruling that the objections raised by the plaintiff, Snowshoe Company, were without substance. The Fourth Circuit found that the appeal by Snowshoe Company was without merit based on its review of the record, oral arguments, and the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Shenandoah Federal Savings & Loan Association, John N. Taylor, and David W. Ralston. The district court had adopted the bankruptcy court's proposed findings and conclusions, ruling that the objections raised by the plaintiff, Snowshoe Company, were without substance. The Fourth Circuit found that the appeal by Snowshoe Company was without merit based on its review of the record, oral arguments, and the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    977 F.

    2d 574

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    In re: SNOWSHOE COMPANY, Debtor.
    SNOWSHOE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    SHENANDOAH FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN
    ASSOCIATION; John N.
    Taylor; David W. Ralston, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 91-2095.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Argued: April 10, 1992
    Decided: October 20, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
    West Virginia, at Elkins.
    Argued: Spicer Franklin Burford, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellant. M.
    Blane Michael, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, West Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    On Brief: Ellen S. Cappellanti, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, West
    Virginia; Lawrence A. Katz, Gary D. Weinfield, Zuckerman, Spaeder,
    Goldstein, Taylor & Kolker, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
    N.D.W.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and DOUMAR,
    United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by
    designation.

    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    The district court adopted the bankruptcy court's proposed findings and
    conclusions after ruling that the Snowshoe Company's specific objections were
    without substance and entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants.
    Our consideration of the record, the oral argument and the district court's
    opinion in this case has revealed that this appeal by the Snowshoe Company is
    without merit. Accordingly, we affirm this order on the reasoning of the district
    court. In re Snowshoe Company, debtor: Snowshoe Co. v. Shenandoah Fed.
    Sav. & Loan Ass'n, No. CA-88-43-E (N.D.W. Va. April 17, 1991).
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like